I was going to wait until I got all the information, but I figured "What the heck. Let's start the discussion now."
Seabourn decided a few months ago to end most of its complimentary Seabourn Experiences (http://goldringtravel.blogspot.com/2008/09/seabourn-is-discontinuing-complimentary.html) and, obviously, it was not met with great joy. While I know many of my clients did not attend most of them, there are others that loyally did and feel cheated. I was not in favor of their demise and offered my clients some compensation if they took an alternative tour.
Seabourn, as noted in its blog, is now emphasizing private tours...not paid for "get on the bus" tours, but truly luxury private tours. Seabourn has a staff of eight devoted to this. As noted recently on the Seabourn blog:
Helen Panagos, Seabourn’s VP of Shoreside Operations, came up with a plan to totally revamp the company’s destination services resources. “We learned a lot from talking with our guests about what they really wanted to do during their cruises,” says Helen. “Some of them are still interested in the more general interest types of tours that we have been offering. But more and more of them wanted truly unique, customized arrangements for themselves and the small group of people they travel with-maybe family or friends. So we designed a whole new department to provide the sort of attention and expertise that can create very special experiences that aren’t off-the-shelf sightseeing tours, but rather unique, personalized arrangements that make for a perfect, memorable day in a port.”
Now that may not be what people looking for the lowest price cruise wants to hear, but possibly considering the previously unexpected drop in base cruise fares, Seabourn may have decided to provide the best "onboard" cruise experience and leave the shore experiences (with a few notable exceptions) to each guest's personal interests and budgets.
With a different approach, just before the holidays began, I received an email from Regent announcing it is going to be announcing certain specific 2009 cruises that will have complimentary tours included. I do not have any more information, but it may work for those disappointed with Seabourn's decision. (On the other hand, I know that I and many others have, in the past, been very disappointed with some of Regent's tours and its tour desk.). Until I know more I really can't comment, so stay tuned.
My question to ponder is, for now, "Would you be willing to cancel your Seabourn cruise so that you can take advantage of complimentary tours on a Regent cruise." If you answer Yes, then you can stop complaining about Seabourn eliminating its single Seabourn Experience on most cruises...for you have found your solution. If you answer No, then you believe the Seabourn cruise experience is what matters more to you.
When I have more information as to the cruises involved and the tours being offered by Regent I will let you know.
Monday, December 29, 2008
Sunday, December 28, 2008
Even When Skiing Iamboatman Thinks About The Cruise Industry - Training and Consistency Is the Cornerstone.
The other day I wrote about Mark Conroy, President of Regent Seven Seas Cruises' open letter and Regent's new efforts to provide what it has promised it would be providing all along. I am hopeful, but not enthusiastic.
Well, I am a member of the Tahoe Mountain Club - a sort of country club for skiers and golfers belonging to Northstar-at-Tahoe or Old Greenwood - here in Lake Tahoe, California. It has, to be kind, been a monument to ripping off those of us shelling out tens and tens of thousands of dollars under the guise of providing the ultimate in luxury ski and gold experiences. It has actually been nothing more than a vehicle to sell faux luxury to those interested in being nothing more than fractional owners (read "timeshare") or renters.
The result has been really good looking facilities overrun with children, people who don't give a damn about the facilities or other "members", and the "real members" (those who actually paid up to $100,000 for a membership...I am a member, but not in that league!) being unable to find real luxury anywhere in the very facilities they have paid for. (The General Manager actually sent out a letter last Spring claiming TMC was striving to reach an 8 out of 10...a B-...in all areas!)
This year I have found things to be just as bad...almost. Just when I was about to give up, Schaffer's Camp, a private TMC restaurant on the top of Northstar-at-Tahoe, gave me some hope. After my screaming for two years about the faux luxury, a pretentious but dishonest and inept manager, horrid overpriced food and lousy service, Tahoe Mountain Club finally listened. I walked in the door and was greeted by, "Hello Mr. Goldring. Nice to see you." The new manager, Brad Kohler, happened to be there and started to speak to me with enthusiasm. They found me a table in the dining room (I was going to eat in the bar) and was greeted by a very nice and competent waiter, trained and smiling bus-staff, a menu and wine list with reasonable food and wine at reasonable prices (and a true wine expert on staff)...and all of a sudden that Million Dollar View looked a whole lot better and the food was excellent.
Being the skeptic I am, I went back the next day and found things...get this...exactly the same! Consistency has possibly found another home. While I remain skeptical, the present situation in one small portion of the Tahoe Mountain Club has - after years - finally seems to deliver what was promised...at least at Schaffer's Camp. (Last night at 6PM in the Alpine Club kids still were allowed to run amuck, classless and loud renters and filth - from the thin and marginally trained staff being unable to properly cleanup due to overwhelmed and chaotic situation.)
If Tahoe Mountain Club can make things work -even one facility at a time - Regent should be able to do it to. Regent has an advantage, as well: It has never been in as bad a shape as TMC.
That said, I kept thinking those that haven't tried Seabourn need to. For me it sets the standard. It is better at an excellent level of service...in all areas of its ships, with truly fine dining and, while not perfect, always striving for consistency.
Well, I am a member of the Tahoe Mountain Club - a sort of country club for skiers and golfers belonging to Northstar-at-Tahoe or Old Greenwood - here in Lake Tahoe, California. It has, to be kind, been a monument to ripping off those of us shelling out tens and tens of thousands of dollars under the guise of providing the ultimate in luxury ski and gold experiences. It has actually been nothing more than a vehicle to sell faux luxury to those interested in being nothing more than fractional owners (read "timeshare") or renters.
The result has been really good looking facilities overrun with children, people who don't give a damn about the facilities or other "members", and the "real members" (those who actually paid up to $100,000 for a membership...I am a member, but not in that league!) being unable to find real luxury anywhere in the very facilities they have paid for. (The General Manager actually sent out a letter last Spring claiming TMC was striving to reach an 8 out of 10...a B-...in all areas!)
This year I have found things to be just as bad...almost. Just when I was about to give up, Schaffer's Camp, a private TMC restaurant on the top of Northstar-at-Tahoe, gave me some hope. After my screaming for two years about the faux luxury, a pretentious but dishonest and inept manager, horrid overpriced food and lousy service, Tahoe Mountain Club finally listened. I walked in the door and was greeted by, "Hello Mr. Goldring. Nice to see you." The new manager, Brad Kohler, happened to be there and started to speak to me with enthusiasm. They found me a table in the dining room (I was going to eat in the bar) and was greeted by a very nice and competent waiter, trained and smiling bus-staff, a menu and wine list with reasonable food and wine at reasonable prices (and a true wine expert on staff)...and all of a sudden that Million Dollar View looked a whole lot better and the food was excellent.
How did this transformation happen? BIG changes. There was an admission by TMC's management that they were doing it wrong. They brought in a fresh and enthusiastic face who actually knew the business. He is taking it slow, limiting the reservations in the restaurant so that the staff (cooks to busboys) can learn what to do, how to do it better and making sure execution is excellent. I repeatedly heard, "We want to take it slow so that we can deliver consistent service and product." Music to my ears!!!
Being the skeptic I am, I went back the next day and found things...get this...exactly the same! Consistency has possibly found another home. While I remain skeptical, the present situation in one small portion of the Tahoe Mountain Club has - after years - finally seems to deliver what was promised...at least at Schaffer's Camp. (Last night at 6PM in the Alpine Club kids still were allowed to run amuck, classless and loud renters and filth - from the thin and marginally trained staff being unable to properly cleanup due to overwhelmed and chaotic situation.)
If Tahoe Mountain Club can make things work -even one facility at a time - Regent should be able to do it to. Regent has an advantage, as well: It has never been in as bad a shape as TMC.
That said, I kept thinking those that haven't tried Seabourn need to. For me it sets the standard. It is better at an excellent level of service...in all areas of its ships, with truly fine dining and, while not perfect, always striving for consistency.
Friday, December 26, 2008
An Open Letter from Mark Conroy, President of Regent Seven Seas Cruise s - A Refreshing Admission.
On December 23, 2008 at 6:37 p.m. (at the close of business, so effectively on Christmas Eve) Mark Conroy, President of Regent Seven Seas Cruises took the unusual step of posting an open letter on Cruise Critic which was clearly in response to some of the now more consistent posts about the declining quality, inconsistent service and changes on Regent cruises.
Mr. Conroy wrote (and I have highlighted a few things) as follows:
Dear RSSC Guests and Cruise Critic Readers,
I’ve been an avid reader of Cruise Critic for many years and have always found it, along with direct feedback from our guests, to be an invaluable feedback tool and a great way for us to keep our finger on the pulse of our company and our product.
After reading some of the most recent threads, I wanted to take a few moments to provide you all with some insights, address some of the concerns that you have voiced, and provide you with my personal reassurance that Regent Seven Seas Cruises is still the same luxury experience that so many of you have come to know and love.
There has been a great deal of discussion about changes and I will be frank, yes, there have been changes. And while we all know that change can be unsettling, I want to assure you that any changes we have made or are in the process of making, are based upon feedback from our guests, travel agent partners and team members aboard the ships and here in Fort Lauderdale. Feedback and insight from you is something that has been critical to our success and has been our proverbial guiding light.
In the interest of providing you with some keener insight, I want to step back to earlier this year when there was a change in ownership. This change allowed us as a company to change from one that was a very small part of a large corporation to one that was part of a smaller and very focused organization. With that change, we as a company saw tremendous opportunities to not only undertake initiatives that we would not have in the past, but to also challenge ourselves to find new ways to make the experience better and shine brighter. The $40 million dollar renovation and refurbishment of the Voyager and Mariner are probably the most obvious examples of our new mindset and our commitment to the Regent Experience.
And the investments don’t stop at the way the ships look and feel, we’re raising the bar in every conceivable area - the culinary experience, onboard amenities and entertainment, crew recruitment, crew training and most importantly, crew retention. It’s the stellar group of officers, staff and crew that have made RSSC the cruise line it is today and we will never lose sight of that. We’ve made some great enhancements to our training and benefits for the crew in the way of increased benefits, enhanced health coverage, overtime pay and dedicated Crew Resource Managers. We’ve also brought greater consistency to our crew scheduling and the vacation time they spend ashore. Ultimately, we want every crew member to leave the ship at the end of their contract with an assignment letter to return for a new contact. That’s not to say that you won’t see some new faces as we will continue to recruit and add new staff aboard ship and in the shore side operations.
We’ve been very fortunate to be able to welcome some new members to our family this past year, some of them returning RSSC veterans. Robin Lindsay and Franco Semeraro, who head up the Vessel and Hotel Operations, are both veterans of the luxury cruise and worked with me when in RSSC was just a small fledgling line with only the Radisson Diamond and Song of Flower. They were instrumental in establishing RSSC as a premier luxury brand and then went on to spend a good number of years at Silversea. Michael Coghlan, the General Manager of the Voyager, also hails from Silversea and has an admirable resume of accomplishments.
There are also plenty of familiar faces amongst the new. Steph Armegol and Bernhard Klotz, whom many of you may have met, still lead our Hotel and Culinary operations teams. Of course, Captains Dag and McNeill, General Managers Engelbert, Guiseppe and Philippe, just to name a few, all happily remain.
With the Voyager refit behind us, and the completion of Mariner’s refit only a few short weeks away, we’re in the home stretch. With that, the majority of changes and enhancements in the product will be complete and we can focus on fine-tuning our product and its delivery. The fine-tuning aspect is one that will be ongoing and once again, we’ll be counting on you, our guests to provide us feedback on what you like and what needs attention, just as you have always done.
That’s not to say that in the midst of these changes that we will not have hiccups. We’ve had a few and while some companies might like to think they are perfect, we know we are not. But we try hard to be as close to it as possible, we give it our all and pour our hearts into it. And if something is not right, we will do everything we can to set things right.
For those of you sailing in the coming months, I encourage you to judge any of the changes on their own merits, I’m confident that you will see that they have been made for the better. And if something is not quite right, please make sure to let any of the staff or department heads know so they can take corrective actions.
I’ll be out and about on the ships a great deal in the coming year, as I am sure Frank, Robin, Franco and Ken will be as well, and look forward to hearing your thoughts. In between, I’ll be reading Cruise Critic and be chiming in on occasion, as time permits.
I wish you all a safe and joyous Holiday Season and a great New Year.
Sincerely,
Mark Conroy
President, Regent Seven Seas Cruises
While the letter is refreshing on its face, I have to wonder why it is it took so long to admit to everyone that Regent was not delivering the luxury product it charges such a high premium for. I have consistently commented that Regent's food is not "luxury", that its amenities were downgraded to essentially "common", that its crew training and performance was poor and, most importantly, there was very little consistency of product on the same ship, no less across the ships.
So for all of those that have felt I push Seabourn to a fault, I have always called it as I see it. As they say, "The proof is in the pudding." Seabourn has gone over the top to try and make its service not only consistent on each cruise and across its present ships, but on its Seabourn Odyssey as well. You will not see a similar letter from Pamela Conover...because it simply isn't necessary. (No, Seabourn is not perfect, but "fine tuning" is its way of life...not a new concept.)
So, in this economy, you just might want to ask yourself, "Do I want to spend my money on Regent's work in progress or on Seabourn's consistent luxury product?"
Honestly, if Regent's pricing was more in line with the reality of its product I might well say, "Go for it", but not yet. (I will be posting on this subject soon.)
I wish Regent all the best in its endeavors and, to be sure, I want it to succeed; for competition and alternatives are great for business. But until the product is proven...and after years of telling me "All is well" when we now have read Mr. Conroy's honest admission it was not...Regent is not going to get my endorsement.
I am pleased with Regent's words and its announced commitment to make Regent the luxury product it once was. I can't wait to be able to, once again, recommend it!
Mr. Conroy wrote (and I have highlighted a few things) as follows:
Dear RSSC Guests and Cruise Critic Readers,
I’ve been an avid reader of Cruise Critic for many years and have always found it, along with direct feedback from our guests, to be an invaluable feedback tool and a great way for us to keep our finger on the pulse of our company and our product.
After reading some of the most recent threads, I wanted to take a few moments to provide you all with some insights, address some of the concerns that you have voiced, and provide you with my personal reassurance that Regent Seven Seas Cruises is still the same luxury experience that so many of you have come to know and love.
There has been a great deal of discussion about changes and I will be frank, yes, there have been changes. And while we all know that change can be unsettling, I want to assure you that any changes we have made or are in the process of making, are based upon feedback from our guests, travel agent partners and team members aboard the ships and here in Fort Lauderdale. Feedback and insight from you is something that has been critical to our success and has been our proverbial guiding light.
In the interest of providing you with some keener insight, I want to step back to earlier this year when there was a change in ownership. This change allowed us as a company to change from one that was a very small part of a large corporation to one that was part of a smaller and very focused organization. With that change, we as a company saw tremendous opportunities to not only undertake initiatives that we would not have in the past, but to also challenge ourselves to find new ways to make the experience better and shine brighter. The $40 million dollar renovation and refurbishment of the Voyager and Mariner are probably the most obvious examples of our new mindset and our commitment to the Regent Experience.
And the investments don’t stop at the way the ships look and feel, we’re raising the bar in every conceivable area - the culinary experience, onboard amenities and entertainment, crew recruitment, crew training and most importantly, crew retention. It’s the stellar group of officers, staff and crew that have made RSSC the cruise line it is today and we will never lose sight of that. We’ve made some great enhancements to our training and benefits for the crew in the way of increased benefits, enhanced health coverage, overtime pay and dedicated Crew Resource Managers. We’ve also brought greater consistency to our crew scheduling and the vacation time they spend ashore. Ultimately, we want every crew member to leave the ship at the end of their contract with an assignment letter to return for a new contact. That’s not to say that you won’t see some new faces as we will continue to recruit and add new staff aboard ship and in the shore side operations.
We’ve been very fortunate to be able to welcome some new members to our family this past year, some of them returning RSSC veterans. Robin Lindsay and Franco Semeraro, who head up the Vessel and Hotel Operations, are both veterans of the luxury cruise and worked with me when in RSSC was just a small fledgling line with only the Radisson Diamond and Song of Flower. They were instrumental in establishing RSSC as a premier luxury brand and then went on to spend a good number of years at Silversea. Michael Coghlan, the General Manager of the Voyager, also hails from Silversea and has an admirable resume of accomplishments.
There are also plenty of familiar faces amongst the new. Steph Armegol and Bernhard Klotz, whom many of you may have met, still lead our Hotel and Culinary operations teams. Of course, Captains Dag and McNeill, General Managers Engelbert, Guiseppe and Philippe, just to name a few, all happily remain.
With the Voyager refit behind us, and the completion of Mariner’s refit only a few short weeks away, we’re in the home stretch. With that, the majority of changes and enhancements in the product will be complete and we can focus on fine-tuning our product and its delivery. The fine-tuning aspect is one that will be ongoing and once again, we’ll be counting on you, our guests to provide us feedback on what you like and what needs attention, just as you have always done.
That’s not to say that in the midst of these changes that we will not have hiccups. We’ve had a few and while some companies might like to think they are perfect, we know we are not. But we try hard to be as close to it as possible, we give it our all and pour our hearts into it. And if something is not right, we will do everything we can to set things right.
For those of you sailing in the coming months, I encourage you to judge any of the changes on their own merits, I’m confident that you will see that they have been made for the better. And if something is not quite right, please make sure to let any of the staff or department heads know so they can take corrective actions.
I’ll be out and about on the ships a great deal in the coming year, as I am sure Frank, Robin, Franco and Ken will be as well, and look forward to hearing your thoughts. In between, I’ll be reading Cruise Critic and be chiming in on occasion, as time permits.
I wish you all a safe and joyous Holiday Season and a great New Year.
Sincerely,
Mark Conroy
President, Regent Seven Seas Cruises
While the letter is refreshing on its face, I have to wonder why it is it took so long to admit to everyone that Regent was not delivering the luxury product it charges such a high premium for. I have consistently commented that Regent's food is not "luxury", that its amenities were downgraded to essentially "common", that its crew training and performance was poor and, most importantly, there was very little consistency of product on the same ship, no less across the ships.
So for all of those that have felt I push Seabourn to a fault, I have always called it as I see it. As they say, "The proof is in the pudding." Seabourn has gone over the top to try and make its service not only consistent on each cruise and across its present ships, but on its Seabourn Odyssey as well. You will not see a similar letter from Pamela Conover...because it simply isn't necessary. (No, Seabourn is not perfect, but "fine tuning" is its way of life...not a new concept.)
So, in this economy, you just might want to ask yourself, "Do I want to spend my money on Regent's work in progress or on Seabourn's consistent luxury product?"
Honestly, if Regent's pricing was more in line with the reality of its product I might well say, "Go for it", but not yet. (I will be posting on this subject soon.)
I wish Regent all the best in its endeavors and, to be sure, I want it to succeed; for competition and alternatives are great for business. But until the product is proven...and after years of telling me "All is well" when we now have read Mr. Conroy's honest admission it was not...Regent is not going to get my endorsement.
I am pleased with Regent's words and its announced commitment to make Regent the luxury product it once was. I can't wait to be able to, once again, recommend it!
What Value Are The Cruise Critic Message Boards For Luxury Travelers?
On December 23, 2008, the same day politicians make announcements so that media does not pick up on less than positive news, Mark Conroy, President of Regent Seven Seas Cruises took the extraordinary step of posting an open letter on Cruise Critic trying to explain what is going on at Regent. (I will post that in a seperate entry.)
Before providing you with the letter, I want to say that it pretty much acknowledges everything I have posted here (and did post on Cruise Critic) since I realized Regent was for sale and then was sold, to wit: The product has been suffering and there were/are big changes coming. (See, for example, http://goldringtravel.blogspot.com/2008/06/oceania-fication-of-regent-seven-seas.html.)
Juxtaposed, there are the Cruise Critic cheerleaders that have...and incredibly continue to...claim all is well at Regent and the product is wonderful. These are the same people that made personal attacks upon me and the Board Host that allowed it to happen. Is that because Cruise Critic has any interest in its boards actually providing good, solid, information? Absolutely not.
Cruise Critic has allowed itself to spiral down from what once was a top-flight place to find good solid information on luxury travel to one where cliques are the norm (especially on the Seabourn board), cheerleaders provide what seems to be knowingly false information (especially on the Regent board), and critics (as in the name Cruise Critic) are actively abused by other posters and cautioned by the hosts not to comment about clearly fabricated or skewed experiences because "they weren't there". (Always wondered how it is that people are permitted to comment on the handling of bad tours being a consistent problem, but not the supposed mishandling of an another sort of incident.)
Hopefully Mark Conroy's letter - which refreshingly does acknowlege many of the problems that have existed - will be a wake up call for Cruise Critic that it has been doing a lousy job over the past many months and that maybe...just maybe...it might want to refocus on what it's name as to who and what content it should be managing.
To be fair (as I always try to be), there is some value in viewing the Cruise Critic luxury boards. There is some good information provided if you can weave your way around the clutter and stomach the cheerleading and personal attacks. I know that if it - like Regent (ironically) - stuck to what it was, it would be good...really good.
Before providing you with the letter, I want to say that it pretty much acknowledges everything I have posted here (and did post on Cruise Critic) since I realized Regent was for sale and then was sold, to wit: The product has been suffering and there were/are big changes coming. (See, for example, http://goldringtravel.blogspot.com/2008/06/oceania-fication-of-regent-seven-seas.html.)
Juxtaposed, there are the Cruise Critic cheerleaders that have...and incredibly continue to...claim all is well at Regent and the product is wonderful. These are the same people that made personal attacks upon me and the Board Host that allowed it to happen. Is that because Cruise Critic has any interest in its boards actually providing good, solid, information? Absolutely not.
Cruise Critic has allowed itself to spiral down from what once was a top-flight place to find good solid information on luxury travel to one where cliques are the norm (especially on the Seabourn board), cheerleaders provide what seems to be knowingly false information (especially on the Regent board), and critics (as in the name Cruise Critic) are actively abused by other posters and cautioned by the hosts not to comment about clearly fabricated or skewed experiences because "they weren't there". (Always wondered how it is that people are permitted to comment on the handling of bad tours being a consistent problem, but not the supposed mishandling of an another sort of incident.)
Hopefully Mark Conroy's letter - which refreshingly does acknowlege many of the problems that have existed - will be a wake up call for Cruise Critic that it has been doing a lousy job over the past many months and that maybe...just maybe...it might want to refocus on what it's name as to who and what content it should be managing.
To be fair (as I always try to be), there is some value in viewing the Cruise Critic luxury boards. There is some good information provided if you can weave your way around the clutter and stomach the cheerleading and personal attacks. I know that if it - like Regent (ironically) - stuck to what it was, it would be good...really good.
Thursday, December 25, 2008
Happy Holidays
Happy Holidays!
I have been enjoying a bit of quiet time with my family, so I have not been posting these last few days. (OK, so my son breaking his wrist snowboarding the other day wasn't so quiet, but he has his badge of honor - a cast). Sorry for the lack of new info or insights, but I have lots to say and let you know about and will do so in the coming days, so check back.
In the meantime, please enjoy the photos taken from my living room in Lake Tahoe, California as I enjoy today with my family with a truly White Christmas (and Chanukah). With so much bad news, concerns and insecurity about our futures, I am blessed to still be able to look out my window and just go "WOW". Yes, so remember, going WOW now and again is a great thing.
So as I sit here with the fire on, the kid's presents open and the snow is falling, I want to say Thank You for your interest, your friendship, your business and your sharing of my passion of cruising and travel.
Thursday, December 18, 2008
Norwegian Cruise Lines F3 Project Has Wind In Its Sails!
It was announced today that NCL's F3 project will be going forward with an estimated delivery date of May 2010.
Very few details have been announced about the deal between STX France and NCL, but what has been said is that as of now the F3 project is for one ship, with the second ship being canceled, and that the terms of the original deal have been modified (though how has not been disclosed).
Very few details have been announced about the deal between STX France and NCL, but what has been said is that as of now the F3 project is for one ship, with the second ship being canceled, and that the terms of the original deal have been modified (though how has not been disclosed).
Thursday, December 11, 2008
Crystal Cruises Announces 2010 Port Calls to Iran and Other Unique Middle East Ports
A few weeks ago I posted about how being uninformed can lead to misperceptions and result in comments like, "I am not going to THAT part of the world. It just isn't safe."...lumping the entire Middle East into a truly undeserved "No Go" area. Frankly, many Americans have difficulty in understanding the geography, no less politics, of the Middle East, so it is no wonder.
When a place like Dubai is actually very safe (and thanks to huge marketing efforts many Americans believe that) it is, by some, lumped into areas like Yemen as the "Middle East - No Go" area. Mention Kuwait and probably nothing other than Iraq's invasion quickly comes to mind...so it is unsafe. Again, not a true or fair statement.
Sorry, I am not trying to insult, but rather present what is - on the world stage - a perceived undeniable fact. And, to be honest, until I was invited to speak at a superyacht conference in Dubai, U.A.E. (United Arab Emirates), I had a pitiful lacking understanding of not only the geography of the area, but even the basic differences in cultures generally between Dubai, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, etc. The broad differences then break down into many interesting facets that both fascinate and help explain the basis for many of the political and religious issues in the area. (Just the differences between U.A.E. emirates of Dubai and Abu Dhabi are as interesting as the existence of a "secret" island where Kuwaitis go to party.
And while there are, respectfully, many with deep convictions on political, religious and moral grounds not to support the economies of certain countries or rulers, I am one of those that thinks it just might be worth dipping my toe into those foreign (and possibly "scary") waters so that I can better understand what things are really like rather than just what is marketed to me by the media or politically motivated sources.
Crystal Cruises has decided to shake things up a bit and provide an incredible opportunity for those interested in dipping their toes into, and learning a bit more about, this area of the world. Crystal's 2010 108 day "Exploration of Ancient Empires" World Cruise includes maiden calls in:
- Manama, Bahrain;
- Bandar Abbas, Iran;
- Kuwait City, Kuwait;
- Fujairah, UAE;
- Khasab, Oman; and,
- Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
If you are not inclined to take the entire Wold Cruise, you can book World Voyage IV: Middle East Mystique (#0305) which starts in Mumbai and ends in Dubai and/or World Voyage V: Modern & Ancient Marvels (#0306) which starts in Dubai and ends in Athens (visiting Egypt, Israel and Jordan as well as some of the above ports).
With some of the great pricing now available reserving your chance to experience this part of the world in the comfort and security of Crystal Cruises could just be the great opportunity you are looking for.
When a place like Dubai is actually very safe (and thanks to huge marketing efforts many Americans believe that) it is, by some, lumped into areas like Yemen as the "Middle East - No Go" area. Mention Kuwait and probably nothing other than Iraq's invasion quickly comes to mind...so it is unsafe. Again, not a true or fair statement.
Sorry, I am not trying to insult, but rather present what is - on the world stage - a perceived undeniable fact. And, to be honest, until I was invited to speak at a superyacht conference in Dubai, U.A.E. (United Arab Emirates), I had a pitiful lacking understanding of not only the geography of the area, but even the basic differences in cultures generally between Dubai, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, etc. The broad differences then break down into many interesting facets that both fascinate and help explain the basis for many of the political and religious issues in the area. (Just the differences between U.A.E. emirates of Dubai and Abu Dhabi are as interesting as the existence of a "secret" island where Kuwaitis go to party.
And while there are, respectfully, many with deep convictions on political, religious and moral grounds not to support the economies of certain countries or rulers, I am one of those that thinks it just might be worth dipping my toe into those foreign (and possibly "scary") waters so that I can better understand what things are really like rather than just what is marketed to me by the media or politically motivated sources.
Crystal Cruises has decided to shake things up a bit and provide an incredible opportunity for those interested in dipping their toes into, and learning a bit more about, this area of the world. Crystal's 2010 108 day "Exploration of Ancient Empires" World Cruise includes maiden calls in:
- Manama, Bahrain;
- Bandar Abbas, Iran;
- Kuwait City, Kuwait;
- Fujairah, UAE;
- Khasab, Oman; and,
- Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
If you are not inclined to take the entire Wold Cruise, you can book World Voyage IV: Middle East Mystique (#0305) which starts in Mumbai and ends in Dubai and/or World Voyage V: Modern & Ancient Marvels (#0306) which starts in Dubai and ends in Athens (visiting Egypt, Israel and Jordan as well as some of the above ports).
With some of the great pricing now available reserving your chance to experience this part of the world in the comfort and security of Crystal Cruises could just be the great opportunity you are looking for.
Tuesday, December 9, 2008
Discounts and Luxury - Are They Mutually Exclusive and Do They Hurt The Consumer?
Over the past week...and especially the past three weeks...we all have seen something none of us have ever experienced and, worse, we do not really know where it all will be going.
Today someone pointed out an article in the New York Times which was a very interesting read: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/04/fashion/04SHOPPING.html?_r=1&emc=eta1. Basically, it is about Saks Fifth Avenue transforming itself into a discount marketer with deals on designer goods up to 70% off and what effect it has had, and may have in the future, on the luxury fashion market. As the author discusses it, no matter how hard a luxury fashion retailer tries to keep its market-share and its "ineffable luster", the "slash-and-burn" pricing may, in the end, both cause the loss of luxury to have its "mystique" and cause consumers to balk at paying the premiums for a luxury wallet or gown.
By this point you are probably thinking, "Yeah, and that also applies to the luxury cruise market, too." Well, I admit that was my first thought or, better, it is what I perceive will be in the minds of many travelers. Actually, however, that concept is wrong...very wrong. Let me explain.
In the New York Times article there is an example of a Valentino gown retailing at $2,950 marked down 70%. Using that example, I first consider that the gown will be worn once (and only once) by a single woman who must be a particular size/height/measurements. It is, to be sure, the ultimate in decadent purchases and, to be sure, is not going to create a life experience for the purchaser (as the event the dress will be worn at will, in the end, make more of an impression as to the overall experience). I then consider the fact that while the dress may be stunning, most of the women that can and would actually wear that dress can probably make a pair of jeans and a T-shirt also look stunning, so they have many, many fashion options (at far lesser costs) available to them as extremely viable alternatives.
On the cruise side of things, Seabourn has a few, limited in number, seven day cruises selling for $2,840; a very relevant comparison. Forgetting the market is not nearly as limited as to possible purchasers, this commodity is also perishable, if not by season, by time so there is pressure to sell it (rather than keep in on the shelf in inventory as one might a blender). However, the consumer knows that a luxury cruise is not something she/he will use for a matter of a few hours or that it must be supplemented by other events to be truly enjoyed and appreciated. This seven day luxury cruise lasts, well, seven days (not hours) and is the event.
On a Seabourn cruise (or it could be Silversea or Regent Seven Seas, for that matter), your transportation, housing, food, drink and entertainment is included. The cost of strolling the superyacht docks of Monte Carlo, visiting Las Rambla and the markets in Barcelona, or cycling in Porquerolles, France in minimal. And, how many of you cruise on Seabourn to...yes that's right...have a Seabourn Experience onboard the ship? Admit it: Many of you have opted to stay onboard the ship, just to enjoy it, when it arrives in port.
Now that you see one is an object with limited appeal and the other is an experience with much broader appeal, let's look at the mark ups. I don't care how much time is spent hand stitching some exotic fabric, the mark up on designer clothes is absolutely shocking. A shirt may cost $5.00 to produce in China, but will sell (would have sold?) for over $250.00 in the U.S. A $35.00 pair of pants in the U.S. may sell for $150 Euros in France. While all of that mark up is not enjoyed by the retailer, you can be sure that mark ups of 100% and more by them are not unusual.
On the other hand, the markup on cruises is not nearly at those levels. (You may recall my concern when Silversea announced a 25% commission rate and I saw it as a sign of desperation because it wasn't economically viable). Without repeating all that is included in a cruise you must add to it, the cost of the crew, staff, fuel, maintenance, etc., etc.
One other factor is the holy grail of most cruise lines: Onboard Revenue. While on the mentioned lines you drinks and gratuities are included, on the mainstream lines they are extra. Chatting at the Sky Bar costs nothing, while Bingo (talk about profit!) is a hefty extra. You get the idea: Paying for a luxury experience net may not be that much more than if you sail on a mainstream line, but you get a seamless and more polished (i.e. enjoyable) experience.
So if you are feeling ripped off by Saks Fifth Avenue being able to sell designer fashions at 70% off, don't transfer that over to the luxury cruise lines. Not all luxury is created equal and, alas, some luxury actually not only had great value, it remains a great value.
Today someone pointed out an article in the New York Times which was a very interesting read: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/04/fashion/04SHOPPING.html?_r=1&emc=eta1. Basically, it is about Saks Fifth Avenue transforming itself into a discount marketer with deals on designer goods up to 70% off and what effect it has had, and may have in the future, on the luxury fashion market. As the author discusses it, no matter how hard a luxury fashion retailer tries to keep its market-share and its "ineffable luster", the "slash-and-burn" pricing may, in the end, both cause the loss of luxury to have its "mystique" and cause consumers to balk at paying the premiums for a luxury wallet or gown.
By this point you are probably thinking, "Yeah, and that also applies to the luxury cruise market, too." Well, I admit that was my first thought or, better, it is what I perceive will be in the minds of many travelers. Actually, however, that concept is wrong...very wrong. Let me explain.
In the New York Times article there is an example of a Valentino gown retailing at $2,950 marked down 70%. Using that example, I first consider that the gown will be worn once (and only once) by a single woman who must be a particular size/height/measurements. It is, to be sure, the ultimate in decadent purchases and, to be sure, is not going to create a life experience for the purchaser (as the event the dress will be worn at will, in the end, make more of an impression as to the overall experience). I then consider the fact that while the dress may be stunning, most of the women that can and would actually wear that dress can probably make a pair of jeans and a T-shirt also look stunning, so they have many, many fashion options (at far lesser costs) available to them as extremely viable alternatives.
On the cruise side of things, Seabourn has a few, limited in number, seven day cruises selling for $2,840; a very relevant comparison. Forgetting the market is not nearly as limited as to possible purchasers, this commodity is also perishable, if not by season, by time so there is pressure to sell it (rather than keep in on the shelf in inventory as one might a blender). However, the consumer knows that a luxury cruise is not something she/he will use for a matter of a few hours or that it must be supplemented by other events to be truly enjoyed and appreciated. This seven day luxury cruise lasts, well, seven days (not hours) and is the event.
On a Seabourn cruise (or it could be Silversea or Regent Seven Seas, for that matter), your transportation, housing, food, drink and entertainment is included. The cost of strolling the superyacht docks of Monte Carlo, visiting Las Rambla and the markets in Barcelona, or cycling in Porquerolles, France in minimal. And, how many of you cruise on Seabourn to...yes that's right...have a Seabourn Experience onboard the ship? Admit it: Many of you have opted to stay onboard the ship, just to enjoy it, when it arrives in port.
Now that you see one is an object with limited appeal and the other is an experience with much broader appeal, let's look at the mark ups. I don't care how much time is spent hand stitching some exotic fabric, the mark up on designer clothes is absolutely shocking. A shirt may cost $5.00 to produce in China, but will sell (would have sold?) for over $250.00 in the U.S. A $35.00 pair of pants in the U.S. may sell for $150 Euros in France. While all of that mark up is not enjoyed by the retailer, you can be sure that mark ups of 100% and more by them are not unusual.
On the other hand, the markup on cruises is not nearly at those levels. (You may recall my concern when Silversea announced a 25% commission rate and I saw it as a sign of desperation because it wasn't economically viable). Without repeating all that is included in a cruise you must add to it, the cost of the crew, staff, fuel, maintenance, etc., etc.
One other factor is the holy grail of most cruise lines: Onboard Revenue. While on the mentioned lines you drinks and gratuities are included, on the mainstream lines they are extra. Chatting at the Sky Bar costs nothing, while Bingo (talk about profit!) is a hefty extra. You get the idea: Paying for a luxury experience net may not be that much more than if you sail on a mainstream line, but you get a seamless and more polished (i.e. enjoyable) experience.
So if you are feeling ripped off by Saks Fifth Avenue being able to sell designer fashions at 70% off, don't transfer that over to the luxury cruise lines. Not all luxury is created equal and, alas, some luxury actually not only had great value, it remains a great value.
Monday, December 8, 2008
Another Seabourn Promotion - Between Friends
If you are a group of three or more couples (so it does not apply to singles) traveling together on the same cruise and at least one of the couples is brand new to Seabourn and you are not paying a 50% Club Value Savings or similar 50% off promotion (a 45% Early Booking Savings is the maximum discount), you are eligible for $1,500 per couple in onboard credit to be applied only to Private Shore Excursions on most 2009 European voyages arranged through the line’s Signature Service Desk, including active, culinary and cultural offerings. Guests may choose from over 60 departures of some two dozen cruise itineraries of seven to 14 days in the Mediterranean, Western Europe, Scandinavia, Russia and the Norwegian fjords.
Each group of friends can tour together or separately, with their own guide, their own driver and their own private vehicle, choosing from hundreds of options exploring Europe’s fascinating destinations at their own pace and on their own terms -- or creating their own customized experiences to match the group’s particular tastes and interests. Some examples of private arrangements that might appeal to a group include:
• Joining a top Italian chef for a hands-on, three-hour cooking class in Florence.
• Going on a tasting tour in Rapallo, Italy, with specialty food expert Guido Porrati who will introduce you to focaccia, pesto, olive oil, salame Sant’Olcese, Avetano cheese, strusciata cake and excellent local wines.
• Sailing via private yacht to Birla, Sweden to tour Viking Age ruins, including an in-depth tour of Gronsoo, a privately owned castle on the lake.
• Riding a mountain bike through the wonderful landscape of the Mounts of Malaga in Spain.
• Letting an expert local shopping guide show you around Stockholm’s most famous boutiques with the most internationally acclaimed brands.
This is combinable with Goldring Travel's Exclusive Seabourn Referral Program http://goldringtravel.blogspot.com/2008/10/goldring-travels-new-and-exclusive.html
So, if you are able to find a new to Seabourn couple and another couple of your choosing, you can find yourself with a nifty savings of up to $750 a person on Seabourn arranged Private Excursions.
Each group of friends can tour together or separately, with their own guide, their own driver and their own private vehicle, choosing from hundreds of options exploring Europe’s fascinating destinations at their own pace and on their own terms -- or creating their own customized experiences to match the group’s particular tastes and interests. Some examples of private arrangements that might appeal to a group include:
• Joining a top Italian chef for a hands-on, three-hour cooking class in Florence.
• Going on a tasting tour in Rapallo, Italy, with specialty food expert Guido Porrati who will introduce you to focaccia, pesto, olive oil, salame Sant’Olcese, Avetano cheese, strusciata cake and excellent local wines.
• Sailing via private yacht to Birla, Sweden to tour Viking Age ruins, including an in-depth tour of Gronsoo, a privately owned castle on the lake.
• Riding a mountain bike through the wonderful landscape of the Mounts of Malaga in Spain.
• Letting an expert local shopping guide show you around Stockholm’s most famous boutiques with the most internationally acclaimed brands.
This is combinable with Goldring Travel's Exclusive Seabourn Referral Program http://goldringtravel.blogspot.com/2008/10/goldring-travels-new-and-exclusive.html
So, if you are able to find a new to Seabourn couple and another couple of your choosing, you can find yourself with a nifty savings of up to $750 a person on Seabourn arranged Private Excursions.
Sunday, December 7, 2008
Seabourn Specials...And I Mean REALLY Special
Seabourn is having somewhat of an unusual situation as a result of the economic situation: Some cruises are booking extremely well, some are essentially sold out and, then again, there are some that are just booking slow.
While I am not a big supporter of “giving away the ship”, tomorrow morning (Monday) Seabourn will virtually be doing that on some select sailings…and the prices will only be available for one week:
Legend June 20 Monte Carlo to Barcelona 7-days - Lead price = $2840
Legend July 11 Rome to Monte Carlo 7-days - Lead price = $2840
Spirit June 20 Venice to Rome 7-days - Lead price = $2840
Spirit July 11 Venice to Rome 7-days - Lead price = $2840
Spirit Aug 1 Venice to Rome 7-days - Lead price = $2840
Pride Apr 14 Athens to Lisbon 14-days - Lead price = $4416
Pride Aug 20 Copenhagen to Copenhagen 9-days - Lead price = $3600
These fares are subject to taxes (but alas no more fuel supplements!), are capacity controlled, subject to prior sale and may be withdrawn at anytime.
For anyone who hasn’t tried Seabourn, or who was thinking that maybe it just was too expensive right now (with the holidays upon us), or who thought that waiting until closer in to the sail date was a good strategy, I am very confident that NOW is the time to book one or more of these cruises.
Call or email me sooner than later, as I am sure that the lowest priced suites will be selling out quickly.
I can start booking these incredibly low fares as early as 9:00 AM on Monday, so I will be in the office by 8:00 am to review any emails and to take your calls.
Enjoy the rest of your weekend…and if you have any questions, feel free to email or call me today.
While I am not a big supporter of “giving away the ship”, tomorrow morning (Monday) Seabourn will virtually be doing that on some select sailings…and the prices will only be available for one week:
Legend June 20 Monte Carlo to Barcelona 7-days - Lead price = $2840
Legend July 11 Rome to Monte Carlo 7-days - Lead price = $2840
Spirit June 20 Venice to Rome 7-days - Lead price = $2840
Spirit July 11 Venice to Rome 7-days - Lead price = $2840
Spirit Aug 1 Venice to Rome 7-days - Lead price = $2840
Pride Apr 14 Athens to Lisbon 14-days - Lead price = $4416
Pride Aug 20 Copenhagen to Copenhagen 9-days - Lead price = $3600
These fares are subject to taxes (but alas no more fuel supplements!), are capacity controlled, subject to prior sale and may be withdrawn at anytime.
For anyone who hasn’t tried Seabourn, or who was thinking that maybe it just was too expensive right now (with the holidays upon us), or who thought that waiting until closer in to the sail date was a good strategy, I am very confident that NOW is the time to book one or more of these cruises.
Call or email me sooner than later, as I am sure that the lowest priced suites will be selling out quickly.
I can start booking these incredibly low fares as early as 9:00 AM on Monday, so I will be in the office by 8:00 am to review any emails and to take your calls.
Enjoy the rest of your weekend…and if you have any questions, feel free to email or call me today.
Thursday, December 4, 2008
Cruise Lines' Fuel Supplements Suspended by Carnival Corp.
With oil prices having plummeted to $46 a barrel, Carnival Corp. has suspended (not eliminated) its fuel supplement for all of its major brands: Seabourn, Cunard, Holland America, Princess, Costa and Carnival.
This is how it will work: A refund of the fuel supplement will be made in the form of a shipboard credit for all bookings within the final payment period for departures on or after December 17, 2008. All bookings outside of the final payment period for departures on or after December 17, 2008 will be adjusted to remove the fuel supplement and guests will be provided with a revised final payment amount.
I am confident the other cruise lines will follow suit shortly.
Now, if only for the airlines!
This is how it will work: A refund of the fuel supplement will be made in the form of a shipboard credit for all bookings within the final payment period for departures on or after December 17, 2008. All bookings outside of the final payment period for departures on or after December 17, 2008 will be adjusted to remove the fuel supplement and guests will be provided with a revised final payment amount.
I am confident the other cruise lines will follow suit shortly.
Now, if only for the airlines!
Global Superyacht Forum - Some Thoughts About Regulations In this Economy: It Should Be About Quality Crew and Training.
Last month I was on the following panel at the Global Superyacht Forum in Amsterdam:
This extended debating session following on from GSF 2007, will allow delegates to discuss and debate the various ways in which interpretations and consistency of rules would help improve the process of building and designing large yachts. In addition the session will highlight some of the key changes and developments amongst the Flag states and Class societies.
Peter Southgate - Cayman Islands Shipping Registry
David Ralph – Maritime and Coastguard Agency
Eric Goldring – Goldring & Goldring
Robert Curry - American Bureau of Shipping - Europe
Paolo Moretti - RINA
Engel de Boer - Lloyd's Register
The discussion started out with ABS (a Classification society - which is charged with "classing" or determining and assuring the structural/mechanical/operational quality of the yacht) discussing some new regulations regarding windows, port lights and some other items, followed by MCA discussing the need to regulate further and then a discussion about actual work toward some consistency between the government regulators (MCA), the shipping registries (the governmental agencies involved with "home ports" such as you see noted on the stern of ships) and the classification societies.
Discussion then led to a comment that many of the "theories" used in creating these regulations do not work in practice; that walking on a Superyacht during construction is worthwhile, but seeing how the regulations actually work in practice...when the Superyacht is in operation...is quite another thing. And, to be sure, that is not regularly done or those experiences regularly considered with the new regulations.
I then raised the subject of why "Cost Benefit Analysis" is not being done in relation to the ever increasingly stringent regulations on design and equipment, noting that the Superyacht industry has not had a fatality or life-threatening injury due to a yacht's failure in well over a year (possibly over 2 years or more); evidencing the industry is one of the safest in the world. I further stated that while I am sure there will, unfortunately, be a catastrophic accident in the future there most probably will invariably be a significant human element in that loss. (No one disagreed with my premise.)
With that preface I asked why the regulators, registries and classification societies do not run the cost benefit analysis that are run in literally every other business whether it be automotive, aviation or even the space shuttle; noting that in the present economy the concept of there is plenty of money so spending it on supposed increased safety doesn't work...if it ultimately causes yards to fail and yachts not to be built or purchased.
After not really hearing much of a substantive response, another reprsentative from the MCA noted from the audience that they had an "ethical responsibility" to generate the ever more stringent regulations. My response was "Don't get me started with the problems of regulating ethics. I could give an entire seminar on the topic."
To me that "canned" response was, as it has been in the past, shameful. Regulations are to be based upon "engineering"; not "ethics". The MCA's demand that "saving human lives!!!!!" is what is all about and anyone that doesn't prescribe to that philosophy is unethical is, frankly, horrific. To me it is a smoke screen for politicians trying to justify their existence. How can I so boldly state this? It is easy.
In an industry where there is a history of years of no catastrophic losses due to items which are the subject of these regulations we are, fortunately, already at the supposed "Theoretical Zero." You cannot improve on that kind of consistent history simply by throwing regulations and creating higher standards in the hope that it "may" at some point cause one or two theoretically possible losses from happening at some unknown point in the future.
What you can do is use the, now more than ever, finite amount of available dollars available for designing safety on what is the weakest link in the Superyacht...and cruise...industry: Crew.
Imagine how much safety could actually be improved with the millions of dollars expended on crew recruitment, education, training and safety? Dollar for dollar, euro for euro and pound for pound I do not believe there is a single soul in the Superyacht or cruise industry that could...or frankly, would...argue that my position is incorrect.
The MCA will argue that it has training requirements. The fact is that within the Superyacht industry captains, crew and managers are screaming that taking MCA required tests do not make good captains: years of actual experience (and not just sea time) does. A head in a book versus a head in an engine room, a seat in a classroom or at the helm, where do you think the knowledge actually is obtained?
When you walk on a superyacht or a cruise ship even the most novice of passengers (forget the professionals) can instantly identify the crew members that "get it", that having the training and who exude the confidence and knowledge that puts every one of us at ease.
In an emergency, do you want:
1. A supposedly "idiot-proof" designed piece of equipment with an idiot standing by the ready to use it; or,
2. A still well designed piece of equipment with a well-trained and knowledgeable crew member able to operate the equipment, even if it doesn't work perfectly, to its optimum level?
Personally, I would guess that 100% would vote for keeping the word "idiot" out of the equation!
So my question is simple: Why to the regulators like MCA insist on more regulations on equipment with a history of excellent safety, drawing millions in funds away from actual crew recruitment and improvement, when the real improvements in avoiding accidents lies with crew?
I have no answers. Do you?
This extended debating session following on from GSF 2007, will allow delegates to discuss and debate the various ways in which interpretations and consistency of rules would help improve the process of building and designing large yachts. In addition the session will highlight some of the key changes and developments amongst the Flag states and Class societies.
Peter Southgate - Cayman Islands Shipping Registry
David Ralph – Maritime and Coastguard Agency
Eric Goldring – Goldring & Goldring
Robert Curry - American Bureau of Shipping - Europe
Paolo Moretti - RINA
Engel de Boer - Lloyd's Register
The discussion started out with ABS (a Classification society - which is charged with "classing" or determining and assuring the structural/mechanical/operational quality of the yacht) discussing some new regulations regarding windows, port lights and some other items, followed by MCA discussing the need to regulate further and then a discussion about actual work toward some consistency between the government regulators (MCA), the shipping registries (the governmental agencies involved with "home ports" such as you see noted on the stern of ships) and the classification societies.
Discussion then led to a comment that many of the "theories" used in creating these regulations do not work in practice; that walking on a Superyacht during construction is worthwhile, but seeing how the regulations actually work in practice...when the Superyacht is in operation...is quite another thing. And, to be sure, that is not regularly done or those experiences regularly considered with the new regulations.
I then raised the subject of why "Cost Benefit Analysis" is not being done in relation to the ever increasingly stringent regulations on design and equipment, noting that the Superyacht industry has not had a fatality or life-threatening injury due to a yacht's failure in well over a year (possibly over 2 years or more); evidencing the industry is one of the safest in the world. I further stated that while I am sure there will, unfortunately, be a catastrophic accident in the future there most probably will invariably be a significant human element in that loss. (No one disagreed with my premise.)
With that preface I asked why the regulators, registries and classification societies do not run the cost benefit analysis that are run in literally every other business whether it be automotive, aviation or even the space shuttle; noting that in the present economy the concept of there is plenty of money so spending it on supposed increased safety doesn't work...if it ultimately causes yards to fail and yachts not to be built or purchased.
After not really hearing much of a substantive response, another reprsentative from the MCA noted from the audience that they had an "ethical responsibility" to generate the ever more stringent regulations. My response was "Don't get me started with the problems of regulating ethics. I could give an entire seminar on the topic."
To me that "canned" response was, as it has been in the past, shameful. Regulations are to be based upon "engineering"; not "ethics". The MCA's demand that "saving human lives!!!!!" is what is all about and anyone that doesn't prescribe to that philosophy is unethical is, frankly, horrific. To me it is a smoke screen for politicians trying to justify their existence. How can I so boldly state this? It is easy.
In an industry where there is a history of years of no catastrophic losses due to items which are the subject of these regulations we are, fortunately, already at the supposed "Theoretical Zero." You cannot improve on that kind of consistent history simply by throwing regulations and creating higher standards in the hope that it "may" at some point cause one or two theoretically possible losses from happening at some unknown point in the future.
What you can do is use the, now more than ever, finite amount of available dollars available for designing safety on what is the weakest link in the Superyacht...and cruise...industry: Crew.
Imagine how much safety could actually be improved with the millions of dollars expended on crew recruitment, education, training and safety? Dollar for dollar, euro for euro and pound for pound I do not believe there is a single soul in the Superyacht or cruise industry that could...or frankly, would...argue that my position is incorrect.
The MCA will argue that it has training requirements. The fact is that within the Superyacht industry captains, crew and managers are screaming that taking MCA required tests do not make good captains: years of actual experience (and not just sea time) does. A head in a book versus a head in an engine room, a seat in a classroom or at the helm, where do you think the knowledge actually is obtained?
When you walk on a superyacht or a cruise ship even the most novice of passengers (forget the professionals) can instantly identify the crew members that "get it", that having the training and who exude the confidence and knowledge that puts every one of us at ease.
In an emergency, do you want:
1. A supposedly "idiot-proof" designed piece of equipment with an idiot standing by the ready to use it; or,
2. A still well designed piece of equipment with a well-trained and knowledgeable crew member able to operate the equipment, even if it doesn't work perfectly, to its optimum level?
Personally, I would guess that 100% would vote for keeping the word "idiot" out of the equation!
So my question is simple: Why to the regulators like MCA insist on more regulations on equipment with a history of excellent safety, drawing millions in funds away from actual crew recruitment and improvement, when the real improvements in avoiding accidents lies with crew?
I have no answers. Do you?
Tuesday, December 2, 2008
Piracy and Cruise Ships - Reality vs. Hype
This afternoon I walked out of a meeting in New York City with a fellow superyacht industry person discussing the now normal issues of what is the happening in world markets and BAM, it hit me in the face: A giant electronic ticker tape announcing the pirate attack on the Oceania Nautica...which happened three days ago; rendering it hardly worthy of being a headline. Then I returned to my office and found a note about an article announcing the cruise lines are reacting to the pirate attack...but then read on to see that the cruise lines are doing little different as of yet.
Blazing headlines of something that was pretty much a non-event (see below before you get upset with my characterization) and an article hinting at big changes when it actually says the cruise lines haven't changed a thing and only a few imminent port calls in Mumbai (a totally different subject I thought) have been canceled.
For years I have seen the 2005 incident regarding the Seabourn Spirit mentioned...and mentioned...and mentioned. It was, until earlier this week, a single incident with a "news" life of three years. Why?
Seabourn just transited the Gulf of Aden, which lies between Somalia and Yemen, with absolutely no incident. Seabourn did arrange for an escort by the French Navy, which most certainly acted as a deterrent, but it, alas, was a non-event...and not reported. Why?
The Oceania Nautica just had an incident where pirates came within 300 yards of the ship. That is three (3) American football fields, to put things in perspective. It is, most certainly, worrisome, and must not be belittled, but the fact is that the Nautica is very substantially larger than the Seabourn Spirit and it did what it was supposed to do. Net result: Nothing happened. Perspective: I have received direct word from a witness on the ship that it was "all very low key on the ship".
Now, while the media is hyping this story and repeats it with "updates" minutes apart, the reality it is not worthy of being an ongoing banner headline news story. It is a concern and it must be addressed, but not only for cruise ships, but for the entire maritime industry that plies those waters. It must also be kept in perspective that in both instances - three years apart - no passengers were injured and tactics have been put in place since the 2005 incident to not only place cruise lines on guard, but to be very proactive.
So why are there some posters on message boards like Cruise Critic pretty much ranting how they are not going to risk their lives cruising in "that" part of the world? Silly hysteria does nothing to responsibly warn of a real danger nor does it do anything to actually improve one's safety or quality of life. But, to be fair, when the media takes a newsworthy story and then fabricates into being a"reality" that does not even arguably exist it is shameful. (It is the same media that recently told us we would have to live with US$100.00+ oil for the rest of our lives...as just one other example.)
Keeping it in perspective, performing intimate acts on a ship's railing is more dangerous (yes, it happened on Princess). Being drunk on a cruise ship is more dangerous. Heck, I am confident walking up the gangway is more of a hazard. How about a rouge wave? Helmsman error? These things do not cause cruisers to shun cruises or cruise lines.
To the extent the hype brings awareness of potential danger to those with "idiot" stamped on their foreheads, fine. (Yes, I know, you think that is a bit strong, but how many of you actually thought of "doing it" on a ship's railing 10 decks above the sea on a moving ship...and then actually did it?) To the extent that it brings to the cruise lines attention the need for more vigilance, fine as well.
But here, Seabourn took action after its event three years ago and Oceania did as well. Both worked. So what is the issue here?
There are bad people out there and we need to be aware of them and, when appropriate, minimize the risks they pose. But we should not buy into the hype.
The hype is not to benefit us, it is to benefit the media by having more people read or watch it, so we can be bombarded with more advertisements to sell us things with labels like, "Do not iron garment while wearing."
Blazing headlines of something that was pretty much a non-event (see below before you get upset with my characterization) and an article hinting at big changes when it actually says the cruise lines haven't changed a thing and only a few imminent port calls in Mumbai (a totally different subject I thought) have been canceled.
For years I have seen the 2005 incident regarding the Seabourn Spirit mentioned...and mentioned...and mentioned. It was, until earlier this week, a single incident with a "news" life of three years. Why?
Seabourn just transited the Gulf of Aden, which lies between Somalia and Yemen, with absolutely no incident. Seabourn did arrange for an escort by the French Navy, which most certainly acted as a deterrent, but it, alas, was a non-event...and not reported. Why?
The Oceania Nautica just had an incident where pirates came within 300 yards of the ship. That is three (3) American football fields, to put things in perspective. It is, most certainly, worrisome, and must not be belittled, but the fact is that the Nautica is very substantially larger than the Seabourn Spirit and it did what it was supposed to do. Net result: Nothing happened. Perspective: I have received direct word from a witness on the ship that it was "all very low key on the ship".
Now, while the media is hyping this story and repeats it with "updates" minutes apart, the reality it is not worthy of being an ongoing banner headline news story. It is a concern and it must be addressed, but not only for cruise ships, but for the entire maritime industry that plies those waters. It must also be kept in perspective that in both instances - three years apart - no passengers were injured and tactics have been put in place since the 2005 incident to not only place cruise lines on guard, but to be very proactive.
So why are there some posters on message boards like Cruise Critic pretty much ranting how they are not going to risk their lives cruising in "that" part of the world? Silly hysteria does nothing to responsibly warn of a real danger nor does it do anything to actually improve one's safety or quality of life. But, to be fair, when the media takes a newsworthy story and then fabricates into being a"reality" that does not even arguably exist it is shameful. (It is the same media that recently told us we would have to live with US$100.00+ oil for the rest of our lives...as just one other example.)
Keeping it in perspective, performing intimate acts on a ship's railing is more dangerous (yes, it happened on Princess). Being drunk on a cruise ship is more dangerous. Heck, I am confident walking up the gangway is more of a hazard. How about a rouge wave? Helmsman error? These things do not cause cruisers to shun cruises or cruise lines.
To the extent the hype brings awareness of potential danger to those with "idiot" stamped on their foreheads, fine. (Yes, I know, you think that is a bit strong, but how many of you actually thought of "doing it" on a ship's railing 10 decks above the sea on a moving ship...and then actually did it?) To the extent that it brings to the cruise lines attention the need for more vigilance, fine as well.
But here, Seabourn took action after its event three years ago and Oceania did as well. Both worked. So what is the issue here?
There are bad people out there and we need to be aware of them and, when appropriate, minimize the risks they pose. But we should not buy into the hype.
The hype is not to benefit us, it is to benefit the media by having more people read or watch it, so we can be bombarded with more advertisements to sell us things with labels like, "Do not iron garment while wearing."
Monday, December 1, 2008
Silversea - A Call from the Captain!
Late today I received a call from Marilyn Conroy, Silversea's senior vice president of sales and marketing concerning my most recent post.
We had a wonderful chat about Silversea, her perspective on a number of my comments, concerns and theories. And, of course, I listened carefully to both the information she had to share as well as her perspectives.
With Ms. Conroy's permission I want to share the following comments:
First, I am assured Silversea is financially sound. According to Ms. Conroy Silversea has invested $500,000,000 in the purchase and refit of the Prince Albert II, the refurbishment of the Silver Wind and Silver Cloud and, of course, the new Silver Spirit. While I do not equate spending money with having money (Wall Street are you listening?) Ms. Conroy's assurances as to the owner's financial strength cannot be ignored; taken with a grain of salt, possibly, but they most certainly are worthy of note.
Second, news on the Spirit has admittedly been slow in coming and brochures have been delayed because, in part, the desire to have the itineraries perfectly set. However, I am advised that the Spirit is still scheduled to be delivered in December 2009 and, in fact, there may even be a Christmas Cruise offered somewhere in Europe. I am told information will be forthcoming around the first of the year, so we will all have to stay tuned.
Third, I am told the concept behind the desired passenger mix is as a result of Silversea's vision of creating the ambiance of a grand European hotel. Along those lines, the passenger mix is approximately 55% North American and, of those guests, approximately 51% are first time guests from North America. This is actually pretty similar to the information I previously provided here. I can't say if it is a pure marketing scheme or one created out of the reality of where bookings are of recent history coming from (i.e. with the then weaker dollar), but it is what it is.
Fourth, passenger loads/occupancy is not what Silversea (or frankly any cruise line) wants it to be but Ms. Conroy claims Silversea is running at about 80% or so of capacity...which is actually an increase from a few years ago.
Now for the other, not as positive, information - but provided with all due candor...and that is, to be sure, priceless:
Fifth, the Prince Albert II in French Polynesia was not a good idea. It is an exploration ship and, thus is without a pool...not a good thing for many in French Polynesia. (Though, frankly, I don't think I ever went into Regent's Paul Gauguin's pool after spending my days in the sea.) It just didn't sell. So the ship is literally being laid up and will be doing Antarctic and Artic voyages. That is why there is a hole in the schedule. My question was answered, but laying up a cruise ship (no matter the size) is not one's favorite choice as it just costs money with absolutely no return.
Sixth, according to Ms. Conroy the change from European to Filipino staff was done, in part, because some of the European staff were not as friendly as they might have been. However, the training of the Filipino staff was not instantaneous and there was a significant learning curve. Personally, I am not buying this one. While there are definite cultural differences between Filipinos and Europeans (and many cultural differences between Europeans!) this all comes down to training, training and training (as well has happy staff). I have had wonderful Filipino staff on Celebrity and outstanding European staff on Seabourn. It can be done regardless of culture...even though the styles may be different as a result of those cultures. I also remain convinced that the change was, in the other part, a cost savings measure.
Finally, the 25% commission offering combined with 50% off savings. As I tried to explain in my original post, 50% off savings are not really 50% off of a real price. Ms. Conroy also correctly points out that Silversea does have 50% off savings for its past passengers from time to time and extending it to first time guests is not the most desirable thing, but in this economic climate all cruise lines are sweetening the pot (my words) so different schemes are tried.
Further, while the 25% commission rate is very high (and, again, I hesitate to provide the "normal" rates) the design was asserted to be a motivator. Again, I am not sure I am buying that one. I sell the cruises my clients desire. To claim I would sell them a less desirable cruise because I would be making more money is not exactly a compliment. To be sure not every travel agent is as passionate about the business in the long run as I am, but whether it be the exploiting of greed or providing a way for agents to provide additional savings to their clients, the 25% commission thing still bothers me and indicates something isn't right. (We can agree to disagree on this point.)
So what does this all mean? It means that communication is a wonderful thing. Expressing different perspectives on the same facts is a fantastic way to allow each reader to decide for themselves where things are...and if they are relevant to them or of just passing interest.
I am pleased that the Cruise Lines read my blog. I am more pleased that they speak with me and provide me with information. That is, in the end, a great benefit to you. You get the real information, discussion and perspectives.
We had a wonderful chat about Silversea, her perspective on a number of my comments, concerns and theories. And, of course, I listened carefully to both the information she had to share as well as her perspectives.
With Ms. Conroy's permission I want to share the following comments:
First, I am assured Silversea is financially sound. According to Ms. Conroy Silversea has invested $500,000,000 in the purchase and refit of the Prince Albert II, the refurbishment of the Silver Wind and Silver Cloud and, of course, the new Silver Spirit. While I do not equate spending money with having money (Wall Street are you listening?) Ms. Conroy's assurances as to the owner's financial strength cannot be ignored; taken with a grain of salt, possibly, but they most certainly are worthy of note.
Second, news on the Spirit has admittedly been slow in coming and brochures have been delayed because, in part, the desire to have the itineraries perfectly set. However, I am advised that the Spirit is still scheduled to be delivered in December 2009 and, in fact, there may even be a Christmas Cruise offered somewhere in Europe. I am told information will be forthcoming around the first of the year, so we will all have to stay tuned.
Third, I am told the concept behind the desired passenger mix is as a result of Silversea's vision of creating the ambiance of a grand European hotel. Along those lines, the passenger mix is approximately 55% North American and, of those guests, approximately 51% are first time guests from North America. This is actually pretty similar to the information I previously provided here. I can't say if it is a pure marketing scheme or one created out of the reality of where bookings are of recent history coming from (i.e. with the then weaker dollar), but it is what it is.
Fourth, passenger loads/occupancy is not what Silversea (or frankly any cruise line) wants it to be but Ms. Conroy claims Silversea is running at about 80% or so of capacity...which is actually an increase from a few years ago.
Now for the other, not as positive, information - but provided with all due candor...and that is, to be sure, priceless:
Fifth, the Prince Albert II in French Polynesia was not a good idea. It is an exploration ship and, thus is without a pool...not a good thing for many in French Polynesia. (Though, frankly, I don't think I ever went into Regent's Paul Gauguin's pool after spending my days in the sea.) It just didn't sell. So the ship is literally being laid up and will be doing Antarctic and Artic voyages. That is why there is a hole in the schedule. My question was answered, but laying up a cruise ship (no matter the size) is not one's favorite choice as it just costs money with absolutely no return.
Sixth, according to Ms. Conroy the change from European to Filipino staff was done, in part, because some of the European staff were not as friendly as they might have been. However, the training of the Filipino staff was not instantaneous and there was a significant learning curve. Personally, I am not buying this one. While there are definite cultural differences between Filipinos and Europeans (and many cultural differences between Europeans!) this all comes down to training, training and training (as well has happy staff). I have had wonderful Filipino staff on Celebrity and outstanding European staff on Seabourn. It can be done regardless of culture...even though the styles may be different as a result of those cultures. I also remain convinced that the change was, in the other part, a cost savings measure.
Finally, the 25% commission offering combined with 50% off savings. As I tried to explain in my original post, 50% off savings are not really 50% off of a real price. Ms. Conroy also correctly points out that Silversea does have 50% off savings for its past passengers from time to time and extending it to first time guests is not the most desirable thing, but in this economic climate all cruise lines are sweetening the pot (my words) so different schemes are tried.
Further, while the 25% commission rate is very high (and, again, I hesitate to provide the "normal" rates) the design was asserted to be a motivator. Again, I am not sure I am buying that one. I sell the cruises my clients desire. To claim I would sell them a less desirable cruise because I would be making more money is not exactly a compliment. To be sure not every travel agent is as passionate about the business in the long run as I am, but whether it be the exploiting of greed or providing a way for agents to provide additional savings to their clients, the 25% commission thing still bothers me and indicates something isn't right. (We can agree to disagree on this point.)
So what does this all mean? It means that communication is a wonderful thing. Expressing different perspectives on the same facts is a fantastic way to allow each reader to decide for themselves where things are...and if they are relevant to them or of just passing interest.
I am pleased that the Cruise Lines read my blog. I am more pleased that they speak with me and provide me with information. That is, in the end, a great benefit to you. You get the real information, discussion and perspectives.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)